One validated system for regulated labeling.

Label management, regulatory data, destination labeling and serialization in a single validated platform: from a single plant to a global enterprise.

Where it hurts

Three problems, solved at the root.

Not a feature list. These are the three things that make regulated labeling expensive, and what RONOVA does about each.

01Change management

A single label change touches artwork, product data, translations and templates. Reconstructing what actually changed, and why, means reading back through email.

Every change carries its reason and everything it touched.

Change management captures the reason for a change at the moment it is made, and links every object altered as part of it. The change set is one record rather than a trail to reassemble later: what changed, why, who approved it, and what moved with it.

02Audit and e-signature

An inspector asks who approved this label, when, and on what basis. The answer is spread across systems, or in somebody's memory.

A complete audit history, signed.

Every user action and every change is recorded against a person, a time and a reason, with electronic signature for 21 CFR Part 11. The history is the evidence: it does not have to be assembled for an audit, because it was never kept anywhere else.

03Printing workflows

Production printing never quite matches the workflow a vendor assumed. So the system gets worked around at the line, and the controls get worked around with it.

Printing workflows configured to your process.

Fully configurable, web-based printing workflows built to match the production printing process a plant already runs: rather than a fixed sequence the floor has to adapt to, or abandon.

The label is the last step and the least controlled.

Labeling sits at the end of the process, after everything else has been validated. It is where a wrong translation, an out-of-date instruction or an unapproved artwork revision reaches the product, and a large share of device recalls trace back to exactly that.

Four regulators, four rulebooks, one device.

The United States, the European Union, Brazil and China each define their own identifiers, data sets and language requirements. Managed separately they diverge, and the divergence surfaces as a rejected submission or an inspection finding.

Validation makes change expensive.

In a validated environment every change carries qualification effort. Systems that make change cheap by making it uncontrolled are not an option, so the control model has to be designed in rather than layered on.

Validated by design

Built for the environments that audit you.

Compliance is not a module. The control model (who may change what, and what evidence that leaves) is the architecture.

  • 21 CFR Part 11.

    Electronic records and signatures, with enforced re-authentication.

  • EU MDR & IVDR.

    Label and instructions-for-use content, symbols, and language per destination.

  • ANVISA & NMPA

    Portuguese and Simplified Chinese content, with carriers at every packaging level.

  • GAMP 5.

    Risk-based validation and IQ/OQ/PQ documentation, delivered against Innovatum's ISO 9001:2015 certified quality system.

  • Immutable audit trail

    Every change attributable to a person, a reason, and a timestamp.

  • EU 1169/2011 & FALCPA.

    Ingredient, allergen, and nutrition declarations that follow the recipe.

  • UN GHS & EU CLP.

    Hazard pictograms, signal words, and precautionary text from one classification.

  • IATF 16949 & VDA 4902.

    Per-customer transport and part labels resolved from one shipment record.

Common questions

Is RONOVA validated for regulated environments?

RONOVA is built for 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, with electronic signatures, immutable audit trails and role-based access control, and the same controls satisfy equivalent expectations under EU Annex 11, EU MDR, NMPA and ANVISA oversight. Innovatum supplies IQ/OQ/PQ documentation and validation support, and Innovatum's own quality system is certified to ISO 9001:2015. Validation is always for intended use, so qualification is completed against the customer's own configuration.

We currently run ROBAR. What happens to our system?

Nothing has to happen: ROBAR is still supported and still sold, and there is no forced migration. If you do choose to move, RONOVA is reached on a supported path that carries across label templates, master data and approval history, with Innovatum handling the migration and the revalidation so an existing configuration is not rebuilt from scratch. Whether the move is worth making depends on your estate, which is a conversation rather than a deadline.

How does RONOVA integrate with SAP and other ERP systems?

RONOVA integrates with SAP, Oracle and other ERP and MES systems through documented APIs and message-based interfaces. Product and order data flows from the system of record into labeling without manual re-entry.

Does RONOVA suit a single site as well as a global enterprise?

Yes. The same validated path to release applies whether one plant prints labels or two hundred do. A single-site manufacturer gets the same control model without the multi-site coordination it does not need, and the system scales as sites are added rather than being replaced.

Stop rewriting code for new print layouts.

Watch how easy it is to configure custom web-printing workflows.

Request a demo

Cookie preferences